Linx Insights works with energy, transportation, manufacturing and
infrastructure organizations. We find the AI use cases worth funding, prove
them on your own operating data, and get them into production.
Most clients start small and expand once the numbers hold up.
Four kinds of engagement.
Industrial organizations rarely fail at AI because the modelling is hard. They fail
because someone picked the wrong use case, or the data was not ready, or nobody
agreed what success would look like. We spend the first few weeks on those questions.
AI Readiness Assessment
1-2 months
We review your data, sit with the people who generate and use it, and map your end-to-end workflows to see where AI would add value, and where it would not.
Prioritized, costed use cases
Data readiness and gap analysis
Implementation roadmap
Projected ROI per use case
Proof-of-Value Pilot
~3 months
We take a single bounded scope and build a working model against your historical data. The baseline and the success measure are agreed before any of it starts.
Working model on your data
Measured baseline vs. result
Honest read on what didn't work
Decision-ready scale-up plan
Build & Deploy
Ongoing
Production models wired into the systems your teams already use, with the monitoring and controls needed to keep them reliable over time.
Integration with existing systems
Model monitoring and drift checks
Documentation and handover
Operator and analyst training
Advisory & Capability
Retainer
Senior support for teams building their own AI capability, so the expertise stays in house after we leave.
Vendor and tooling evaluation
Data and AI governance
Portfolio and roadmap reviews
Team coaching and upskilling
Industries
Sectors where downtime and safety performance carry real cost.
The sectors we know from the inside.
We came out of operations rather than research: regulated generation, transit networks,
asset-intensive utilities and industrial risk. Select an industry to see the work that applies there.
Energy & Nuclear
Regulated environments where an unplanned outage is expensive and every change has to survive scrutiny. We have worked inside plant operations, work management and asset lifecycle planning.
Predictive maintenance Equipment health models built from sensor data and maintenance history.
Outage planning Historical schedules, work orders and parts data turned into resource forecasts.
Work management Schedule optimization that reads the emails and meeting transcripts as well as the formal plan.
Capital portfolio Investment plans re-sequenced against real equipment condition and obsolescence risk.
Transportation & Transit
Networks where safety and service performance are measured in public. We designed and validated an operator risk model end to end for this sector.
Operator risk profiling Early identification of elevated risk, so you can intervene before an incident rather than investigate after one.
Incident & near-miss analysis Structured and written reports mined for repeating causes.
Fleet maintenance Failure prediction and shop scheduling across mixed vehicle types.
Service reliability Route, run and schedule analysis against on-time performance drivers.
Manufacturing & Heavy Industry
Plants sitting on years of process data and maintenance history that nobody has time to read through. The techniques we use in regulated generation transfer directly.
Equipment health Condition monitoring and failure prediction on critical assets.
Quality & yield Process parameters correlated with scrap, rework and downgrade.
Maintenance planning Preventive intervals rebuilt around observed failure behaviour.
Shift-log intelligence Free-text logs and handover notes made searchable and countable.
Utilities & Infrastructure
Long-lived assets, capital plans that run over several cycles, and regulators who expect the forecast to be defensible. Our asset lifecycle work applies here with little translation.
Asset condition End-of-life forecasting based on reliability data rather than nameplate age.
Capital allocation Multi-year investment sequencing tied to actual asset condition.
Field report analysis Inspection and technician write-ups converted to structured risk data.
Work & outage scheduling Crew, parts and window optimization across the portfolio.
Insurance & Industrial Risk
Carriers and risk functions underwrite the same physical assets we work on from the operator's side, so the modelling translates.
Claims triage ML risk scoring that routes the straightforward claims automatically.
Regulatory intelligence Summaries of filings and competitor moves at a shorter cycle time than manual review.
Adverse selection Portfolio monitoring for drift in the risks you are taking on.
Loss history analytics Historical losses linked back to asset and operating conditions.
Selected work
Engagements delivered by our partners. Clients are named on request.
Results we can point to.
Nuclear power generation
Predictive maintenance
Assessed equipment sensor data and maintenance logs to identify AI applications for predicting equipment failures, then developed and implemented solutions for equipment health optimization.
3 high-impact use cases identified and built
Nuclear asset lifecycle
Capital portfolio optimization
Assessed long-range asset investment plans against equipment reliability data and obsolescence risk to optimize multi-cycle capital allocation. This improved the forecast accuracy of end-of-life projections.
$15M+ in capital projects re-sequenced to actual asset condition
Nuclear work management
Schedule optimization
Used custom AI algorithms to optimize maintenance scheduling by analyzing unstructured data, including emails and meeting transcripts, alongside the formal plan.
40% less manual schedule management time70% reduction in schedule variance from baseline
Nuclear plant operations
Outage planning
Assessed 10+ years of outage schedules, work orders and parts data for AI-driven planning optimization. The outputs fed predictive resource allocation.
5 days cut from maintenance outages
P&C insurance
Claims triage automation
Evaluated claims workflows and historical loss data to identify ML-based risk scoring opportunities, and developed the roadmap to automate the routine end of triage.
40% of claims triage automatable$2.1M projected annual savings
P&C insurance
Regulatory & competitor intelligence
Assessed the regulatory and competitor intelligence workflow for major US carriers and identified generative AI opportunities to reduce cycle time and adverse selection risk.
Reduced cycle time and adverse selection risk
In depth
One example of what a full build looks like, start to finish.
A risk model built for transit operations.
We designed and validated an operator risk engine for transit. It combines dozens of
quantitative and qualitative inputs, including supervisors' written comments, into a
single profile that flags elevated risk early enough to act on.
Inputs
Experience
Training hours
Route qualifications
Lateness
Absences
Work schedule
Higher-threat routes
Rule violations
Past incident reports
Weather
Stress & fatigue
Infrastructure issues
Vehicle issues
Near misses
Outputs
Operator risk profile An individual score together with the factors driving it, rather than a single opaque number.
System-wide aggregate view Risk concentration across routes, depots and time.
Recommended intervention The model learns which actions have improved performance in the past.
Measured against your KPIs Built to move LTIR, CIIR and offences against customers and employees.
Approach
Three phases, each with a decision gate. You can stop at any of them.
Start small, and scale only when the results justify it.
PHASE 01
Discover
One to two months reviewing and sanitizing data, meeting the people who own the workflows, and pressure-testing candidate use cases against business need.
You leave with A shortlist of value-added use cases, a roadmap and projected ROI. That is enough to make a decision without spending more.
PHASE 02
Prove
A bounded pilot on a defined scope, such as a single route, line or asset class, using historical data. The baseline and success measure are agreed in advance.
You leave with A working model, results measured against the baseline, and a straight answer on whether it's worth scaling.
PHASE 03
Scale
Deployment across the network or fleet, integrated with your existing systems, with the monitoring, documentation and training it needs to survive handover.
You leave with A production capability your own people can run, and the evidence trail to defend it internally.
Get in touch
Tell us what you're trying to figure out.
You do not need a pitch deck. A short call is usually enough for us to say whether
there is something worth pursuing, and we will tell you plainly if there is not.